Tuesday, March 26, 2024

The Mills on Center Street



Clayton Steam Saw Mill and Cooperage Shop circa 1884, Hudson Museum photo.

This unmarked photo above is one of two recently identified as showing some Clayton mills of the late 1800's.  The area bounded by North Church, West, Center and the adjacent field to the west was the site of saw mills, grist mills and for a short time a carding mill operation.  The man 2nd from left with white tie and umbrella appears to be George R. Mills, Engineer, as seen on the Michigan 1884 census in Clayton.  Mills grew up near Hughes Hwy. on what is now M-34 and his family ran a steam sawmill there.  He was my husband's great-grandfather.  The building in the far left, just above the men's heads, looks like the gambrel-roofed house still standing on the NW corner of Center and West streets.  It is barely visible except for the roofline.  Notice the boy with the bundle of staves and the others with hoop material for barrel making.  A small notice in The Adrian Daily Expositor of Dec. 5, 1881:  "Cross Bros. of Clayton have sold their mill in that village to Mr. Hicks of North Adams, Hillsdale county, who will add to it a large stave mill."

Clayton Steam Grist Mill, Hudson Museum photo, circa 1884, built by Cross Bros. in 1873 following a fire at the previous grist mill owned by Aaron Abbott and bought by William Hix around 1881 (sometimes spelled Hicks)  Mr. Hix appears to be the man with tie and suit jacket 4th from the right.  He is identified in the following newspaper clipping with 1880 Clayton Band photo from the Adrian Daily Telegram's old photo gallery of the 1960's.  

Clayton Band 1880, Mr. Hix 4th from right in middle row.  This identifies him as Fred Hicks, but he looks a lot like the man in the grist mill photo. (Update:  Fred was born 1866 & William's son according to FamilySearch.org--the man in the photos is too old to be Fred) Wm. Hicks owns the grist mill property as seen on the 1893 Lenawee Atlas shown below.  Other prominent Clayton men are in this band, including Warren Cooke with trombone right end middle row, father of the last banker Wilbur Cooke, who died in 1958. Clayton Exchange Bank was the last private bank in the state of Michigan.

.

1874 Lenawee Atlas Clayton
Saw and Grist Mills on Center Street
A fire in 1873 destroyed the grist mill of Aaron Abbott and it was replaced by Cross Brothers at a cost of $10,000, according to Aug 12. 1873 The Daily Press


1893 Lenawee Atlas Clayton
Wm. H. Hicks mill land with Avis and Hicks saw mill, and on the corner the Selleck and Avis Roller Mill on Center Street (here labeled "Hudson St.")




The 1893 map portion above shows the saw mill location labeled Selleck and Avis, at the block N. of Clayton school.  The picture directly above is from the 1874 Lenawee Atlas for Hudson Twp. Section 2 that is on Plank Rd. just E. of Henning Hwy., S. side of road.  I believe the house is no longer there.  But look at the home industry of Mr. Selleck, a steam saw mill.  He and/or his son James became involved with the Clayton Saw Mill of Selleck and Avis.  It is important to draw them into this story as the son married a woman named Rose who figures in the end of all Clayton Mills on Center Street.

Below is an article explaining a bit about Rose Selleck, the burning of the mills, the trial and the verdict.  Note that the article says Prosecutor Bird and the court officers "felt very blue over the matter."  That is Clayton's own John E. Bird who later became Chief Justice of the State of Michigan 
Supreme Court.



January 10, 1898 Daily Telegram (published as Evening Telegram)

 

ROSE NOT GUILTY

------

The Jury Says So After Hours Deliberation.

------

THEY SPENT SATURDAY NIGHT IN THEIR ROOM

------

Stood Eight to Four up to Midnight, Saturday Night

------

Came in Once with a Disagreement—Sent Back

The jury in the Rose Selleck arson case has created a profound sensation by returning a verdict of “not guilty.”  This was contrary to general expectations, as bets were being offered and taken even up that they would either convict or disagree.

The case was given to the jury at 9:15 Saturday morning, and after eating their dinner in their room, they came out at 3:30 that afternoon, reporting that they were unable to reach an agreement.  Judge Chester told them that the nature of the case was such he thought they should come to some kind of an understanding.  This was the second time the case had been tried and both trials had been thorough tests, going over the testimony at great length.  He would therefore suggest that the jury retire again and further consider the case.

At midnight Saturday the jury announced again that they were ready to come out.  The court was assembled, and the same disagreement was reported by the foreman, Horace Holdredge.  They were sent back again by Judge Chester, to consider the case further.  Under Sheriff Shepherd and Deputy Sheriff Knowles were placed on watch and stayed through the long watches of the night.

Sunday morning Judge Chester had everything in readiness so that he could go home to Hillsdale on the 8:37 Lake Shore train, in case a verdict should be rendered.  He was at his private office in the court house early, and a carriage was in readiness to drive him to the depot, if a verdict should be rendered.  Notification was sent to the jury, through Under Sheriff Shepherd, to change from the small jury room in which they had spent the night, to the supervisors’ room, where there was more air.

Under Sheriff Shepherd rapped on the door and notified Foreman Holdredge what was about to take place.

“Wait a moment,” said Mr. Holdredge and the door was again closed.  The court and officers waited about 10 minutes, when there was another rap from the inside.  The foreman announced that they had reached a verdict.  They were brought into the court room, where Judge Chester, Rose Selleck, her friend, Miss Estella Warner, L. R. Salsbury and about 25 men, who had waited around the court house all night or had dropped in, were assembled.

The foreman of the jury announced that they had reached a verdict.  He was asked by the court what the verdict was.

“We find that the prisoner is not guilty of the crime charged against her,” was the response.

The jury was dismissed until Monday, the court adjourned, and Judge Chester just caught the train for Hillsdale.

The weary court officials and the member of the jury went home for a rest.  Mrs. Selleck and her friend took rooms at the Lawrence hotel, and took a long needed respite from the strain of the long trial.  She was naturally pleased about the verdict.

------

How the Jury Stood

This is a problem that is difficult of solving, and may never be known to a certainty.  It is given out by the jurymen that they were sworn to secrecy among themselves, but some of them have been telling different stories about their deliberations.

One juryman stated that they stood 8 for acquittal and 4 for conviction when they took the first ballot, and they stood that way all day and night, until five minutes before they came out on Sunday morning.  At that time, states the juryman, they saw the carriage drive up to the court house, supposedly for Judge Chester, who was anxious to get home and not wanting to stay another 24 hours, they reasoned that no jury would ever convict, so in order to save the expense of another trial they agreed to a verdict of acquittal. 

It is quite positive, so we are informed that Foreman Horace Holdredge was for acquittal, and would stick to the end.

There are other rumors that the jury stood nine for acquittal and three for conviction on the start, and at midnight one was won over to acquittal, making it eight for conviction and four for acquittal.  This afternoon we have been informed that the verdict was right the other way, and it came direct from one of the jurymen, although he would not divulge any names.

------

Opinions

There are various opinions regarding the justness of the verdict, and we think the prevailing sentiment among the people is that the jury did just the right thing, under the charge from Judge Chester.

Prosecuting Attorney Bird and the officers feel very blue over the matter.  In their opinion Rose Selleck is guilty of burning the mill and they feel that if a conviction could not be had in this case there is not much use in trying.

------ 

From The Adrian Daily Times and Expositor, January 7, 1898 is article  about the "Second Mrs. Selleck."  The younger Mr. Selleck had divorced Rose and remarried to Rose's niece!  This is a long article comprised of testimony from the witnesses of Clayton, about the mills, the fire, people's  whereabouts and conversations, so it will take some time to transcribe.  It is available on the Adrian District Library website under Databases (it is not with the NewsBank service).  Some of it is illegible and there is a lot of detail.  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are always moderated and will take awhile to be posted, so please be patient.